Where is there Biblical authority for the celebration of Christmas? Does the Bible command Christians to observe the birthday of Christ? Strange as it may seem, there is no Scripture commanding Christians to observe a wintertime holiday season!

Here is why!

THE FACTS about the origin of Christmas will startle you! Abundant historical evidence proves beyond doubt that Christmas is not of Biblical origin at all. The festival-believe it or not-had its beginnings among the pagans! "Christmas" customs were being observed by almost the whole of the pagan world centuries before Christ!

The largest pagan religious cult which fostered the celebration of December 25 as a holiday throughout the Roman and Greek worlds was pagan sun worship - Mithraism. The chief deity in this heathen religion was the "Sun Goddess" - the Oriental goddess of the heavens, called "the queen of heaven." The season of year when this goddess received her greatest adoration from the pagan world was at the time of the winter solstice-in December. This winter festival was called "the Nativity"-the Nativity of the Sun.

Why haven't most of you been told these facts of history before?

Sir James Frazer in his monumental work on ancient religion, "The Golden Bough," relates that during the second and third centuries after Christ an intense rivalry was apparent between professing Christianity and this old pagan religion of Mithraism. Of course, Christianity, so-called, managed in the end to suppress this strongly implanted pagan creed, but the victory was in name only! History shows a good deal of compromise was effected by the early Catholic leaders with the teachings of Mithraism. Notice: "An instructive relic of the long struggle between Christianity and Mithraism is preserved in our festival of Christmas, which the Church seems to have borrowed directly from its heathen rival. In the Julian Calendar the 25th of December was regarded as the Nativity of the Sun .... The ritual of the nativity, as appears to have been celebrated in Syria and Egypt, was remarkable. The celebrants retired into certain inner shrines, from which at midnight they issued with a loud cry, 'The Virgin has brought forth! The light is waxing.' The Egyptians even represented the newborn sun by the image of an infant [remember, this was before Christ] which ON HIS BIRTHDAY, the winter solstice, they brought forth and exhibited to his worshipers" (from The Golden Bough, St. Martin's ed., pp. 471, 472).

The similarity between this ancient pagan rite and the modern Christmas is as striking as it is obvious!

Let us notice yet another fact recorded by Frazer concerning this winter festival. "No doubt the Virgin who thus conceived and bore a son on the 25th of December was the great Oriental goddess whom the Semites called the Heavenly Virgin or simply the Heavenly Goddess" (p. 472) .

This "Heavenly Goddess" was the pagan Queen of Heaven whose worship (with all her festivals) is utterly condemned in the Bible. Read it for yourself in Jeremiah 7:17-20; 44:15-19.

"What led the ecclesiastical authorities to institute the festival of Christmas? The motives for the innovation are stated with great frankness by a Syrian writer [5th. century A.D.]. . . . 'It was the custom of the heathen to celebrate on the same 25th of December the birthday of the Sun, at which [time] they kindled lights in token of festivity. In these solemnities and festivities the Christians also took part. Accordingly when the doctors of the Church perceived that the Christians had a leaning to this festival, they took counsel and resolved that the true nativity [of Christ] should be solemnized on that day,'" concludes Frazer's quote.

This could hardly be plainer! The Catholic Syrian writer in question lived only a few years after the Christmas festival was officially adopted and sanctioned by the Catholic church. He knew it was borrowed direct from the heathen. And yet, those Church leaders had the plain injunction from God (which they were all aware of) that the customs of the heathen were not to be brought into the worship of Christ. See Jeremiah 10:1-4 for a specific prohibition of the Christmas celebration.

The major reason December 25th was chosen to commemorate Christ's birthday was that it represented the chief religious day among most of the heathen. The Church authorities erroneously reasoned that it was proper to replace the sun god with the son of God- Christ.

Hardly any of the early scholars really believed that Christ was born on December 25. In fact, there were all types of guesses by the men of the fourth and fifth centuries, and almost everyone disagreed with the other. See Smith's Dictionary of Christian Antiquities, Vol. 1, p. 358. But the people just couldn't give up celebrating the season.

The truth is, no man knew - or knows- when Christ was born! The Gospels say nothing as to the day of His birth. This lack of reference is in itself significant. If God had wanted Christians to celebrate His birthday He surely would have told His people when it was!

This omission also shows how unconcerned the Gospel writers were over the exact date of Christ's birth. To the early Christians, there was nothing especially significant in a birthday. Actually the only two instances of birthday celebration in the Bible refer to evil men. Notice Genesis 40:20 where Pharaoh's birthday was observed. And also Matthew 4:6 where it describes John the Baptist being beheaded at Herod's birthday party!

Only the heathen celebrated their birthdays in Bible times. No wonder, then, that the early Church never observed the birthday of Christ. That was a custom of the heathen, not of God's people! The Catholic Encyclopedia admits: "In the scripture, sinners alone, not saints, celebrate their birthdays." 1908 Edition, Vol. 3, p. 724, under article "Christmas."

Thus, it becomes easy to understand why the question of Christ's birth did not really become important until the fourth and fifth centuries. At this time, the matter was looked into because of the influx of pagans into the "Church" and because of their adherence to their old customs-wanting to celebrate the birthdays of their old gods. So, to please the pagans, December 25 was chosen. The Church was, however, destitute of records which showed the exact day of Christ's birth. So it had to forge them in the name of the Roman archives.

Even though there are no records which show the date of Christ's birth, there is sufficient evidence within the Bible itself which clearly reveals that His birth was nowhere near, of all days, December 25.

First, to show this, let us consider the time of Christ's ministry which we find revealed in the Gospel record.

The Gospels show that Christ ministered a little a over three years. To be exact, a prophecy in Daniel 9:27 shows that Christ would preach the Gospel for three and one-half years, or for one-half of a prophetic week. (A natural week has seven days.) This section of Daniel describes a prophetic week or a period of seven prophetic days. In this prophecy, each day equals one year. Daniel, then, is speaking about a seven-year period; and in the midst of that period, that is, at the end of three and one-half years, Christ's earthly ministry would come to an end. (See Numbers 14:34 and Ezekiel 4:6). This Scripture in Daniel gives us a clear prophecy telling us that Christ's ministry would last three and one-half years!

What does this show? Very much! Since we know that Christ's ministry came to an end at Passover time in A.D. 31, then three and one-half years preceding the spring of A.D. 31 would put the commencement of His ministry in the early autumn of A.D. 27.

But what does this prove? Let us see!

The Gospel further tells us that Christ began His ministry just as He was approaching 30 years of age (Luke 3:23). This was the age required by the Old Testament to which priests must attain before they could be installed as official ministers and preachers (Num. 4: 3). The Jews also considered that 30 years of age was the age of maturity and manhood.

Notice what this indication shows. Since Christ was just about 30 years old when He began His ministry in early autumn, A.D. 27, this clearly shows He was born sometime in the early autumn of 4 B.C. - 30 years before!

There are many proofs which point to an autumn birth of Christ. For example, if Christ had been born in any of the seasons preceding autumn 4 B.C.- (that is, spring or summer of 4 B.C.), He would have been past 30 at the commencement of His ministry. But the Scripture says He was about or approaching 30.

Also, let us consider the season immediately after autumn 4 B.C.-the winter. If He had been born in the winter of 4-3 B.C. then He could, of course, have been under 30 when He began preaching (as the Gospel says). But this season is out of the question! Here is why! We have the plain testimony of the Scriptures that the flocks were still in the fields at the time of Christ's birth (Luke 2: 8 ). The flocks were never in the fields in Palestine during the winter season. They were kept inside barns or in protected places during the months from mid-October to mid-March. See Clarke's Commentary - on Luke 2:8. The late autumn and winter of Palestine were too severe for the flocks to remain in the open and unprotected from the rain, wind and frost. Notice Matthew 24:20 for a reference to Palestinian winters.

These facts alone prove that an early autumn 4 B.C. date is the only conceivable period in which Christ could have been born! 

More Proof: The Temple Ritual!

In the New Testament we have another chronological feature which will show the season of Christ's birth. It concerns the time periods in which the Levitical priesthood served in the Temple. By comparing these prescribed times with certain New Testament references, we can arrive at the very season for the birth of Christ.

In the days of Christ, the Aaronic priesthood which offered the sacrifices in the Temple at Jerusalem was divided into 24 separate divisions. Each division (called a "course") had one chief priest who was chosen by lot to represent the whole division in the Temple for a week's period. This chief priest was to offer the evening and morning sacrifices and the incense offerings.

The priesthood was divided into 24 courses by David. In his time there had become so many priests that all could not possibly serve in the Sanctuary at the same time. So David divided them into 24 courses and gave instructions that one course should serve in the Sanctuary for one week, then the next course could serve the following week, etc. These 24 courses of the priesthood are described in 1 Chronicles 24. The names of the individual courses are given from verse 7 through 19.

We are further told by Jewish records that each of these courses began serving at noon on a Sabbath and continued their service until noon the next Sabbath - a one-week period (Sukkah, 55b). The Jewish historian, Josephus, who lived during the time of the Apostle Paul and was himself a priest belonging to the first of the 24 courses (Josephus' Life, 1), also tells us that each one of these courses served one week, from Sabbath to Sabbath (Antiquities, vii, 14,7).

The Jewish records again tell us that the courses also served bi-annually - twice in the year. That is, the first would begin serving in the spring of the year, on the first week of the sacred year. The second course would serve the second week, etc. This went on until the twenty-fourth course had served. Then, in the autumn of the year, at the first week of the civil year, the first course would commence again and all of the courses would repeat the order. Thus, on each of the 48 weeks during the year one particular course of the priests served in the Temple.

But, added to these 48 weeks are 3 extra weeks in the year during which ALL of the courses served together. These 3 weeks were during the three major Holy Day periods: the Passover in the beginning of spring; Pentecost in late spring; and Tabernacles in the early autumn. Because multitudes of people were always in Jerusalem at these three times of the year, ALL 24 courses of the priests stayed on in Jerusalem and served together in the Temple (Sukkah, 55b).

So, the 51 weeks of the Hebrew Calendar are accounted for. (Occasionally, a 13th month was added to the calendar to allow the months to remain in their proper seasons of the year. When this extra month was added, the priests who officiated in the 12th month repeated their service in the 13th - Miggalah, 6b).

It is important to realize that the first course of these 24 divisions began their ministration with the first Sabbath in the first Hebrew month - that was Nisan, in the very early spring. See especially 1 Chronicles 27;1,2 and following verses.

With this information, it becomes possible to know the particular weeks in which each of the 24 priestly courses served in the Temple. And consequently, we can know the time period in which some significant New Testament events took place. Let us now see the importance of this information with regard to Christ's birth.

In the Gospel of Luke we are told that a certain priest named Zacharias was performing his service in the Temple at Jerusalem when a most marvelous thing happened. He was privately told that his wife Elisabeth, who was quite advanced in years, was going to conceive and bear a son and that the son's name was to be John.

This, of course, is familiar to us all. But I wonder how many have noticed the time period in which Zacharias received this information? Let us notice this section of Scripture closely.

"There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of THE COURSE of ABIA {Abijah in Hebrew}: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth" (Luke 1: 5).

This scripture clearly tells us the particular course of the 24 priestly divisions that Zacharias was serving in. It was the course of Abijah.

Notice further!

"And it came to pass, that while he executed the priest's office before God IN THE ORDER of HIS COURSE, according to the custom of the priest's office, his lot was to burn incense when he went into the Temple of the Lord" (Luke 1:8, 9).

Now this is very significant! It shows that Zacharias was serving in the prescribed time intended for the course of Abijah. By referring to 1 Chronicles 24:10, you will see that the course of Abijah was the eighth in order!

This plainly means that he was ministering in the ninth week after the beginning of God's first month Nisan. The reason it was the ninth week and not the eighth is that the Passover season always occurs in the first month and during the third week. Since all 24 courses served that particular week, according to the laws set down by David, this means that Zacharias officiated during the ninth week after the beginning of Nisan, the first month in spring.

Now comes the question: On what days did Zacharias serve?

The year in which all of this occurred "was 5 B.C. The first day of Nisan in this year was a Sabbath, the very day on which the first priestly course began its ministration. On our Roman Calendar, this day was April 6. Thus, by simple arithmetic, Zacharias, "who served in the ninth week, was serving from Iyar 27 to Sivan 5 (June 1 to June 8). This was the time he was told that his wife was going to conceive and bear a son. But let us go one step further.

There was no chance of Zacharias leaving immediately after the ninth week to return home. Why? Because the next week was a Holy Day "week" -it was Pentecost! Zacharias was obliged to remain over one more week with the other 23 priestly courses and serve in the "Temple. This extra service kept him in Jerusalem until Sivan 12, or June 15. At that time he was" free to return to his home in the hill country about 30 miles south of Jerusalem.

Now why are all these dates important. We will see if we pay attention to what the sacred writer tells us.

"And it came to pass that, as soon as the days of his ministration were accomplished, he departed to his own house (Luke 1: 23-24).

This shows Zacharias returned home immediately after his ministration and then his wife conceived (verse 24). This would have occurred about the first week after he returned from Jerusalem. Gabriel had told him that he was to remain dumb, completely speechless, until the child was born. It should be obvious that no man would want to stay in such a condition-and certainly no longer than necessary. And too, Zacharias was a righteous man and was anxious to see God's command fulfilled. So, with reasonable assurance, Elisabeth must have conceived sometime immediately after Pentecost week! This week was from Sivan 12 to Sivan 19 (mid-June).

With this information we are able to come to the exact season for John the Baptist's birth.

The human gestation period is very near 280 days or 9 months and 10 days. If we go forward this amount of time from about Sivan 16 or mid-June in 5 B.C., we arrive at about the first of Nisan (March 27th) 4 B.C. The birth of John the Baptist was undoubtedly near this time-in the very early spring.

Now, let us come to the main question: What about the birth of Christ?

The Gospel says that Christ was just 6 months younger than John the Baptist (Luke 1:26, 36). And, by adding this six months to the time of John's birth (the 1st of Nisan), we come to about the 1st of Tishri or near mid-September for the birth of Christ. So again, we arrive at an early autumn birth for Christ. So Christ was not born in the winter after all!

There are many other evidences which show Christ's early autumn birth. For one, we are told that Joseph and Mary went to Bethlehem to be taxed (Luke 2:1-5). At first sight we might think that this may have been the only reason for their journey from Galilee to Bethlehem. Such, however, was not the case. For if the journey was for taxation purposes alone, only Joseph, the head of the house, was required by law to go. There were absolutely no Roman or Jewish laws which required Mary's presence. But yet, Mary went with Joseph. This fact alone has puzzled commentators for centuries. Why was Mary there?

The fact is, this taxation was coincident with the end of the agricultural year in Palestine - that is, in the early autumn just before the Feast of Tabernacles. It was customary to pay taxes on agricultural products at the end of the civil year-at the end of the harvest. For example, the Law of God commanded that the tithes of agricultural products could be paid year by year (Deut. 14:22). The civil year for tithes and taxes was reckoned from early autumn to early autumn. Even the Jews today adhere to this method of reckoning the ending of the civil years. And also in ancient Palestine, the agricultural or civil year ended and began on the first of Tishri (Hebrew Calendar) - in early autumn.

Some, however assume that while this was very true among the Jews, this particular taxation was decreed by Augustus Caesar, the Roman Emperor (Luke 2:1). Thus, they conclude, it must have been conducted in the Roman manner and not dependent upon Jewish laws. This assumption is not consistent with the facts of history. At the time of this taxing, Judea was merely a "protectorate" of Rome. The Romans did not exact direct taxes from the people during this early period. They were receiving tribute from Herod, but the Romans allowed Herod to gather the taxes as he saw fit. And, it is plainly known that Herod was endeavoring to follow the customary laws of the Jews. Even the most critical of scholars hold that this particular taxation in 4 B.C. was conducted purely in the Jewish manner (Ency. Biblica, cols, 3994-3996). This is, then, a plain indication that the taxation was very near the 1st of Tishri (the early autumn) - the ending of the civil year in Palestine when such things were common.

This, again, shows an early autumn birth for Christ.

Many people have wondered why there was such a large crowd of people in Bethlehem at the time of Christ's birth. Of course, there was the taxation at the time (Luke 2:1) but it never was customary for many people to crowd a town and stay there for a period of time just for taxation purposes. And, as already mentioned, why did Mary journey to the south with Joseph when there was no Roman or Jewish law which commanded her presence at such a place of taxation?

The reason these historical indications are "difficulties" to many Biblical commentators, and seem to be beyond explanation, is because most people fail to realize the true time of year all these took place.

Actually, Joseph and Mary had gone to Bethlehem just at the end of the Jewish civil year. This would have been just the beginning of the Hebrew seventh month of Tishri. During this particular month, Jerusalem and all the immediate towns were filled with people who had come to observe the Holy Days in this seventh month: the Feast of Trumpets, the Day of Atonement and the Feast of Tabernacles.

Bethlehem was one of the towns right near Jerusalem (about 5 miles south) and was considered in the "festival area" of Jerusalem. (See Shekalim, vii, 4.) When the people would come to keep the ordained Holy Days of God, Bethlehem became filled with people. Josephus, the Jewish historian, mentions that it was customary for over 2 million Jews to go to Jerusalem for Passover (one of the Holy Days). See War, vi, 9, 3. Normally, Jerusalem was a city of only 120,000 inhabitants. You can imagine what these 2 million people would do to the housing situation in Jerusalem and the surrounding towns. No wonder, then, that in Bethlehem "there was no room in the inn" (Luke 2:7). The time Christ was born was at a season when Bethlehem was filled with people coming to observe the Holy Days at Jerusalem.

And, no wonder that we find Mary along with Joseph. It was customary for Joseph and Mary (and later their family) to go to Jerusalem for the Holy Festivals (Luke 2:41; John 7:1-10). And, since this autumn time was the end of the civil year in Palestine, a normal year-end taxation by Herod was also associated with this period. Joseph did not want to leave his wife home alone since he had to go to pay taxes and then observe the feast. It could hardly be plainer!

It is also interesting to note that the "inn" in which Joseph and Mary were to stay was not an ordinary caravan hotel. This word in the Greek is used only two other times in the Bible - Mark 14:14 and Luke 22:11. In both places it refers exclusively to temporary "guestchambers" which housed people in Jerusalem during the festival periods. And, since Bethlehem was one of the "overflow" towns which housed many of the people coming to Jerusalem for the Holy Days, it is readily understandable why such "guestchambers" would be in Bethlehem as well.

Actually, these "guestchambers" were primarily in the private homes of people who had opened up their rooms for the influx of people attending the feast.

Rather than remaining at home as ordinarily would have been done, Mary had to come to Bethlehem, and while residing in the "overflow" town of Bethlehem (there being no room for them except in a manger), Christ was born.

With this evidence, we can confidently place the birth of Christ sometime in the early autumn-undoubtedly in the seventh Hebrew month. It could not possibly have been in any other season!

We have Christ's ministry commencing in autumn A.D. 27 right near his 30th year. This places His birth in the early autumn of 4 B.C.

Also, the time for the eighth course of Abijah indicates that John the Baptist was born very near the first of Nisan 4 B.C. -the early spring. Christ was born six months after John-or again, in the early autumn.

We know that this particular taxation mentioned in Luke was reckoned after the Jewish manner. Their civil or harvest year also ended in the early autumn.

And too, there was no room in the "guestchamber" - for there were many people staying in Bethlehem for a period of time. This again corroborates the early autumn birth - during the festival period of the Hebrew seventh month.

But still, with all these indications of the proper season of Christ’s birth, we still do not know the exact day! God never intended us to determine it!

Let us wake up to the truth about Christmas and quit the pagan superstitions we have inherited from childhood!